An Essay About Fairy Tales

A version of this appears in The Bald Princess and Other Tales by me!

One of my favorite things about original fairy tales is how absolutely, unequivocally weird they are.

Modern retellings, my own included, often take the clearest elements of a fairy tale, or the only most basic, underlying structure of the tale, and reapply it in a way that is logical for modern times. For example, you’ll see many Beauty and the Beast retellings that try to eliminate tropes which are now considered problematic—such as themes of bestiality or Stockholm syndrome. You’ll see Cinderella retellings where Cinderella chooses to stay with her family, or ends up encountering the prince well before the ball, so she’s not just running off with a complete stranger. Or retellings of Goose Girl, where the princess has a backbone and doesn’t only rely on magic to solve her problem.

And as part of this process of creating modern retellings, the element of weirdness that permeates so many of the original fairy tales gets written out. Gone are the little surprise nuggets that make you go, “Wait, what just happened?”

Consider, for a moment, Snow White and Rose Red, also known as The Ungrateful Dwarf: in the middle of the original story, the sisters come upon a dwarf with his beard stuck in a tree. Why on earth was his beard stuck in a tree?

The first time I read it, I reread it to make sure I understood, and laughing out loud as the letters “WTF” floated through my brain. Or in the original tale of Cinderella, to make their feet fit into the shoe, her stepsisters chop off their own toes and heels. And in The Little Mermaid, she has to kill the prince and let his blood drip on her feet to turn back into a mermaid.

Those are more well-known stories, but if you get into some of the lesser-known tales, the weird elements get even weirder—in The Mouse, the Bird, and the Sausage, all three aforementioned elements are characters who live together in a house. Just the premise is bizarre. Or have you read Hans the Hedgehog, in which a woman gives birth to a half-boy, half-hedgehog? Or The Three Snake Leaves? Or The Ungrateful Son? And the ones I’ve mentioned so far are just European fairy tales. If you explore stories across the world, like The Bird With Nine Heads, The Woman With Two Skins, The Man With His Leg Tied Up, you will find a wealth of surprising, quirky, and delightful elements mixed in with violence, fear, and destruction.

The weird and wacky abound in old fairy tales, mostly utilized as a technique to teach a lesson (though to be sure, there are more than enough tales that are just weird, with no obvious lesson in sight). As odd as it is, the story The Mouse, the Bird, and the Sausage teaches the reader to find contentment doing what they’re good at; The Ungrateful Son teaches that one should be generous and not greedy; Cinderella teaches that kindness will be rewarded.

But now, many of the lessons previous fairy tales taught us no longer apply. Little Red Riding Hood teaches children to fear the woods, but should we teach our children to fear the woods? Or should we teach them to understand it? And cutting open the wolf with an axe as a solution to the violence it committed would probably be frowned upon by most. And we’re glad Cinderella found a way out of her awful situation, but was marrying a complete stranger really the best option? If the fairy godmother could offer her a fancy dress and a ride to the ball, why couldn’t she have magicked up a job interview or a couple thousand dollars for Cinderella to move to a new city instead?

As society changes, its general values change as well. And the stories we tell reflect those changing values. Or rather, I believe the stories we tell should reflect our changing values.

In 2021, I went on a reading binge, focusing almost exclusively on fairy tale retellings. I read ones you’ve probably heard of, and ones you haven’t. I read fantasy and sci-fi retellings, romance retellings, even some down the pretty steamy end of things, even though steamy isn’t really my cup of tea. I watched a lot of movies too—Holiday fairy tale retellings, young adult retellings, TV shows like Once Upon A Time and Grimm. And I found I was, by and large, rather disappointed.

Sure, there were a few I really liked. And a few I hated. But what I was mostly disappointed by was how closely the underlying values in the modern retellings aligned with the values of the original tales. Are we really still teaching ourselves to be afraid of the unknown? Are we still trying to tell women and girls that their priority in life is marriage to a man? Is true romantic love the only important thing in life?

What about personal agency? What about consent? And having the freedom to make a choice?

Why not teach ourselves what finding choices looks like, or creating love rather than magically being struck with it? Or that not everything is about hard work, and working ourselves to the bone doesn’t make us better than anyone else?

Why not include disabled people in our stories? Or write stories of friendship and trust?

And after some contemplation, what I decided was that perhaps it wasn’t the retellings that were the problem. Perhaps it was the original tales themselves.

So I decided to write some of my own.

The Bald Princess and Other Tales collection of fairy tales reflects me, mostly. It reflects my values, and the underlying themes are those which are important to me. I tend to repeatedly explore themes of personal agency, learning how to change your mind, accepting (or not accepting) the hand you’ve been dealt, what strength looks like, forgiving yourself, and finding ways to connect with and understand people who are different from you.

I don’t claim to speak for everyone. I don’t even mean to suggest that my own values are clear or obvious in these stories. And I certainly don’t mean to suggest that my values are the same as the values of modern culture as a whole.

Instead, all I claim is that in these stories, I attempted to take the quirky oddness I loved in all the old fairy tales I’ve explored, and blend them with values I wish I’d learned from the fairy tales I grew up with.

Patreon Update: Digital Only Rewards + Free eBooks

If you've been following me for a while now, you probably know I have a Patreon! I started it way back in 2018, as I was gearing up with the Land of Szornyek series. My plan was to create monthly artwork I would share as postcards, posters, digital wallpapers, plus my patrons would get ebook copies of all my books included with their subscription, no matter what level they were at—Land of Szornyek, Rove City, Sagittan Chronicles, my original fairy tales, and soon, the Aria's Song trilogy + whatever I come up with next!

As you know, I released the last book in the Land of Szornyek series, Fog & Flame, a few weeks ago. It’s been a long time coming, and I’m proud of the series of books I produced. But Land of Szorynek is only one part of me and my author journey, and while I began this Patreon as a way to support this series, I’ve expanded significantly since then. As such, I’ve spent the last six months considering how I want to move forward with Patreon, and here is what I’ve finally decided.

Starting now, I will be providing digital goods only. My plan is to share art when I have it as well as free ebooks whenever I release a new book, and occasionally stories about myself or whatever else I might feel inspired to share. I don’t want to commit to a tight schedule either as I feel guilty when I’m unable to meet it. Instead, some months I will likely share a slew of new stuff, and other months, not as much.

This means that I will not be sending out any more posters or postcards after the final June one. The cost of printing and stamps has become prohibitive--the postcards now cost me 4x as much, and posters 5x!

I've also updated all the tiers to reflect the new direction I'm going:

· Friend ($1)

· Comrade ($2)

· Accomplice ($5)

· Familiar ($10)

· Warrior ($25)

· Champion ($50)

It's a pretty sweet deal if you read all my books—I publish between 5 - 10 per year typically, which is $12 total for Patreon subscribers versus roughly $20 - $40 if you pay full price. Plus, you'll get your name listed in the acknowledgements. 

I'm so grateful for my Patreon supporters; they've been a huge part of my journey these last five years, and I'm excited to share what's coming down the road.

Strolling Through the Antelucan Mist

Words. My favorite things.

I was reading The Horologicon by Mark Forsyth recently, which is a book exploring the lost words of the English language. It’s pretty funny and entertaining in general, but it also solved a huge problem I’ve been having for years: it gave me the word “antelucan.” Antelucan means something along the lines of “relating to the early morning hours pre-dawn;” not to be confused with “antediluvian,” which means something like “relating to the period before the Great Flood.

I’ve been looking for the word “antelucan” for years. I like to write scenes where people wake up early or stay up all night, and I myself am a morning person, so I like to describe pre-dawn, and honestly “pre-dawn” gets old after a few repetitions. I mean, to be honest, it’s kinda old before even using it for the first time. And if you use the thesaurus as obsessively I do, you’ll learn that “pre-dawn” isn’t in it, and searching for “dawn” yields words like: daybreak, morning, sunrise, daylight, cockcrow, and wee hours, none of which really get at the vibe I want the same way antelucan does.

Before night comes “twilight,” and before dawn comes the antelucan light; antelucan is the twilight of the morning.

“Antelucan” is not the only word I’ve found that I’d been searching for. The Dictionary of Obscure Sorrows is one of my favorite word-inventing/discovering sources. “Sonder,” for example, means, “he realization that each random passerby is living a life as vivid and complex as your own,” and “rubatosis” means, “The unsettling awareness of one's own heartbeat.” Or "agnosthesia" which is "that feeling of not knowing how you feel about something." 

You’re probably not surprised that I’m obsessed with words. I am a writer, after all, and a pretty nerdy one at that. But every so often, I find a word that has a noticeable impact in the way I think about it, a word that helps make my life better by naming an observation or describing a specific experience. It offers nuance and complexity to the way I experience the world, and I find that experience wonderful. Not to mention, it gives me the ability to describe my characters’ experiences in a more complex and nuanced way.

Life is so complicated. And I’ve never really been a fan of simplifying my understanding of it. Rather, I want to acknowledge the complexity of everything, and expanding my language to describe the things I see and experience allows me to do just that.

Monster Compendium: City of Dod

Welcome to part 2 of my monster compendium!

I’ve been doing monster drawings for years now, correlated with the monsters in the Land of Szornyek series.

You can click here for Part 1: Tentacles and Teeth.

Lecui

The lecui is a quiet, unobtrusive monster, who can adapt their physiology to any environment. Their key characteristic? Their blood, when properly prepared, can act as a healing agent for humans. The key thing to note is that if you leave them alone, they’ll leave you alone.

Koponya

Koponyas are the vigilantes of the monster world. They have a sense of justice that aligns with their own moral code, and they will do anything in their power to see that justice is served. The problem, of course, is when their sense of justice doesn’t align with yours. They also have a fog they can manipulate that controls the minds of people and monsters alike. Your best bet is to avoid them, and try not to do anything that will piss them off.

Bogar

Bogars are mean AF. They are massive bug-like creatures with a metallic exoskeleton. They’re impervious to pretty much anything except rain and water, and even that takes time to wear them down. They’re filled with miniature versions of themselves that will run out and find food, fix up damaged spots, etc. They are fast, hungry, and vicious. Your best bet: avoid, avoid, avoid.

Nonda

This fun, moth-like garg is a blood sucking monstrosity. They numb you with a sedative and then will suck your blood ‘til you’re dry. They have wings, eight green eyes, and are really unpleasant. The good news is that as long as you’re not under their influence, they’re pretty easy to kill. Just don’t fall asleep when they’re in the vicinity.

Voro

I can’t say too much about this one, because that would be spoilers, but suffice it to say, it might not look like much, but it’s the worst of the bunch.

Bikak

These gargs are big, but mostly harmless as far as gargs go. They are kind of like enormous, elephant-sized cows with a spiky tail. They have pretty good meat, so they’re one of the better gargs to hunt. They can, and will, stomp on you, though, so be careful.

Szamos

These centipede-like gargs are the size of several horses. They like wide-open fields where they can scurry around, and they’ll just about eat anything. They’re pretty fast though, and they’ll eat anything, so if you see them, hide.

Duda

If a bikak is “mostly harmless,” then a duda is definitely harmless. They eat bugs and leftover garg bits and tend to follow humans around because humans kill a lot of monsters = lots to eat. They can get snappy when they’re hungry, so watch your fingers.

Fireworm

This is one of the largest gargs in existence. A towering, flaming, worm-like creature, it will eat anything that crosses its path. They are pretty dumb though, so if you hold still, it probably won’t see you. Probably.

And that’s it for City of Dod!

Click here to sign up for my newsletter!

Future Fantasy: A Genre I Made Up

Hello, friends! Today I want to talk to you about a genre called “future fantasy.” To be clear, I didn’t entirely make up the concept of future fantasy. There are plenty of books that have a weird blend of science fiction and fantasy (ahem Star Wars) and I know some of you are going to argue with me and say that “Science Fantasy” is already a thing, so… okay, yes, I know.

But, I want to posit that the science fantasy genre is too big, and we need more categorizations. I mean, look at the romance genre. They have categories up the wazoo! (Resisting making a very inappropriate joke here; I’ll let you make it yourself lol.)

Anyway, not only do we need more categorizations, we need clearer ones. One of the things I noticed during my delve into the romance genre, is that they know their tropes. Like, really well. So, once you get into a genre, you can pretty much tell what you’re going to get, just by looking at a cover and reading a blurb. Of course, there are pros and cons to this, but I would argue that while we definitely need writers exploring the edges of genres and filling in the gaps, we also need books that fill readers’ needs right now, and more importantly, we need to be able to clearly communicate that.

All that is besides the point, however. Let’s talk future fantasy!

Remember how I made a chart I thought would help clear up some of the inconsistencies in the romance genre? Well, I made one for science fiction and fantasy too! Scifi & fantasy are often talked about as one thing, and fans of those things often get annoyed by the categorical lumping, because in their minds there are clear differences between the two.

But I think the differences are a lot fuzzier than we might hope. And if we can’t explain the nuances of our genres, then how can we ever hope to convert people to the cause?!

So let’s unfuzzify them.

Defining Science Fiction and Fantasy

See figure 1 below:

For those of you who can’t read my terrible hand writing, the image is of a graph (chart?). The x-axis is labeled technology and the y-axis is labeled magic.

By technology, I mean loosely that the world or the plot has technology in it. This can mean anything from cars to spaceships to vaccines to whatever, that were created by scientists primarily, and at least originate with an idea that is based in our current knowledge of how the world works.

By magic, I mean loosely that the the world or plot has magic in it. This means that things happen in the world which are not related to science, and has nothing to do with how we understand the world to work.

Star Wars is a perfect example. Spaceships, aliens, planets all originate with modern science—we have spaceships, we’ve seen other planets, we’ve sent space probes into interstellar space, and the idea of civilization being able to live and exist the way it does in Star Wars is not too much of a leap of imagination.

Star Wars also has magic. The Force is a mysterious thing that doesn’t really have an explanation. (I’m working off the movies here; have not read the books). It is not based on a current scientific understanding of the way the world works. It’s magic.

Many science fiction stories incorporate magic, and many fantasy stories incorporate technology. Which is why we have “science fantasy” as a category. But honestly, that’s still wicked confusing.

What if a book is set in a fantasy world, but there is a “scientist” who makes technology out of magic? Or what about something like Harry Potter, with contemporary technology and magic?

Or, what if you’re like me and you write a whole series in a futuristic scifi world, but the entire story is based around a character discovering magic, and is made up of nothing but fantasy tropes?

If you follow along the x-axis, this would be considered all scifi. Think military scifi, Dark Matter, Jurassic Park and other Michael Crighton, Greg Bear, etc.

If you follow along the y-axis, that would be considered just fantasy: think Tolkien, Tamora Pierce, Shadow & Bone, Game of Thrones, Terry Pratchett, Sarah J Maas, etc.

But in the middle, that’s what I’m most interested in. Where science/technology and magic both play a role in the story. Dresden Files, where a wizard can have a cell phone. Or Enchantress From the Stars, where from one viewpoint, technology is magic, and from the other viewpoint it’s science. Or Star Trek, where it’s mostly spaceships and technology, but then you have mind readers, and species who can do anything. Or Doctor Who, which is a time travel show (science fiction!) but also magic—take The Christmas Carol episode, with cryogenically frozen people and also flying fish. The “scientific” explanation is just … “aliens” but what at what point does unexplained “science” simply become magic?

The answer here is: we need more categories.

This middle of the chart, which I’ve loosely defined as Science Fantasy, could be broken up into many categories if we wanted to. It’s the wild, wild west ya’ll.

Defining Future Fantasy

Finally, I have arrived at the point of this essay, in which I posit that one possible genre category that would be useful is called “future fantasy.”

The characteristics of future fantasy are as follows:

  • It is set in a separate world. Basically, not earth. Think Middle Earth.

  • But, it is a technologically advanced world. That can look like a lot of things, but think androids, hover tech, virtual reality, AI, spaceships, whatever you want.

  • AND it has magic that is meaningful to world and to the plot. Like Harry Potter. Lord of the Rings. Or ACOTAR.

  • The tropes would align more with fantasy tropes than with sci-fi: more of good vs evil, the chosen one, the dark lord, taverns, powerful artifacts, overqualified heroes, magical creatures, a quest, etc. and less of time travel, alternate universes, evil aliens, simulations, pure energy lifeforms, secret labs, mad scientists, evil AI, technobabble.

(Obviously, I’m a big fan of breaking rules, so clearly these are just general thoughts, not set in stone.)

Also clearly, I think Star Wars would probably pretty closely align with future fantasy, though I know it’s usually categorized as a space opera. Which is fine. Whatever. Stories can be more than one thing.

I think the Marvel Universe might also qualify, except for the part where it’s modern day, but like I said, rules are meant to be broken.

Also, the new series I’m about to release would definitely qualify.

  • A separate world, check (see map).

  • Advanced tech, check: androids, hover tech, big cities, etc.

  • Magic that is meaningful to the world and the plot, check.

  • Tropes align with fantasy: good vs evil, chosen one, dark lord, taverns, powerful artifacts, overqualified heroes, a quest, etc.


So yeah. Future fantasy.

I’m curious if you can think of other books/movies/TV series that fit the definition, and if so please, please, please let me know, because I want to read them.

And also, I’m curious if you have thoughts for any other sci-fi and fantasy categories that you might add into my chart.

That’s all for today! If you want to stay updated on my work, click here to sign up for my newsletter!

Coming soon!