Monsters, Magic, & Mayhem

It’s October and everyone has been putting out their Halloween decorations, so it probably makes sense that I’ve been thinking about monsters a lot. Also, I’m reading a book about the way monsters are used in fiction, I listened to a podcast episode about monsters, and I write about monsters, so yeah… lots of monster contemplation going on over here, lol.

Monsters are an interesting storytelling technique because aside from your average human monster (serial killers, etc.), we don’t really encounter very many “monsters” in day-to-day life. We can live in a city or an urban area, and it’s highly unlikely that a lion is going to show up and start stalking us or a wolf is going to get a bunch of its buddies together and hunt us down. And even in more rural areas, we have houses and guns and electric fences and all kinds of tools and resources to protect ourselves, so the danger is a lot less than if we only had a spear or a knife.

Aliens haven’t shown up yet (as far as we officially know), Lovecraft’s creatures haven’t come knocking, dragons and other magical monsters don’t exist—and so our exposure to monsters in real life is limited to human monsters, wildlife safaris, and the occasional run-in with a black bear or shark (if you live where they do—I’ve not had that problem in Baltimore haha).

And I think that’s one reason we have such a fascination with monsters—it’s that we don’t face them in real life. And trying to imagine what it would be like is exciting, interesting, and reminds us of the things our ancestors faced back when they lived less digitally and more closely with the natural world.

At any rate, as Halloween rolls around, I’ll be enjoying the depictions of ghosts and demons and witches and monsters all over the city, and maybe, if the mood strikes me, watching a scary movie or two. And of course, working on writing my own monsters!

Do you have a favorite scary movie I should check out? (Preferably featuring monsters, of course!)

In celebration of Halloween, enjoy this image of one of one of my creepier monsters (at least, that’s what people tell me lol). It’s a hulla. They use human skin and human brains to reproduce. Yup, lol.

hulla-tree-4.jpg

A couple quick updates:

I’m killing it on new manuscripts! I finished the rough draft of a brand-new urban fantasy trilogy (yes, all three books are drafted) that I’m excited to tell you more about soon.

I also got back the fourth book in the Land of Szornyek series from my betas, and just sent it out to my proofreader.

In Rove City news, I finished a short companion story specifically for my book release newsletter subscribers (click here to subscribe and get the short story for free!) and I have five more books in the series either partially or fully drafted. It’s been a productive couple of months!

I’ve also got a deadline for the audiobook version of Land of Szornyek (holding off on sharing until it’s confirmed!) and have started the process of creating an audio version of the Rove City series.

I’ll also be participating in NaNoWriMo for the ELEVENTH time (I can’t get over that it’s been OVER a decade since I did my first Nano), so if you follow me on Instagram (@arielesieling), you’ll be seeing an uptick in monsters over there.

I’m also working on a few other things (because I’m not great at sitting still lol) and I will check back in with more details once I have them!

Happy October, friends!

monsters in the woods smaller.jpg


How To Do A Writing Sprint

To get more writing tips delivered directly to your inbox, click here to sign up for Writing Tips Weekly!

If you’ve never heard of a writing sprint, let me first say, Welcome to the World of Writing Sprints!

(I’m imagining saying that like the guy in Futurama episode 1.)

Anyway, doing sprints is one of my number one techniques for producing content quickly.

Here’s how they work:

You set a timer, close Facebook, and write until the timer goes off. And if you want, you can measure the number of words you have at the beginning of the sprint and at the end.

That’s it.

It’s that simple.

You can even race with other people if you want. (Though, remember, writing more words doesn’t make you a better writer, more competent, or more qualified. I can write “banana” a thousand times in twenty minutes and totally hack the sprint and make it look like I’m the fastest writer, but that’s stupid and pointless and don’t be a banana.)

My personal preference is to set the timer between 15 - 30 minutes, and take a 5-minute break between sprints. These days, I tend to be closer to the 30 minute range. I find less than 15 min too short to really get into it, and longer than 30 is too long and my attention starts to wane. Other people like to set the timer for five minutes. Or an hour. Or two hours.

It’s really about what works best for you.

Back in the day (way back, think like 8 - 10 years), I had heard of sprints and thought they were stupid. “Why need a timer?” I asked myself. “What’s the difference between writing for twenty minutes with a timer and without?” and so it took me a while to try it.

But there’s definitely a difference. Something about having a defined beginning and end point works really well for my brain. I also find that sprinting with others helps. Something about the social pressure of not having produced any words at all during a sprint makes me want to get my brain into gear.

There are plenty of tools you can use to do the sprint. You can set a timer on your phone, download a desktop timer, use online sites—some people even have browser blocker extensions that make it so you can’t use the internet for that interim of time. What ever works for you.

Quick tip: If you’re writing by hand and sprinting with other people, the easiest way is to do a quick average—count how many words per line for maybe 10 lines, and then how many lines per page, and multiply.

So for example, if you have a sheet with 20 lines, the top ten lines might look like this: 7 words, 8 words, 11 words, 13 words, 15 words, 7 words, 10 words, 8 words, 9 words, 10 words. Add them up (98), divide by the number of lines (9.8 — you can round up to 10) and that gets your per line average = 10 words per line. Then, when you do your calculation at the end, just multiply the average but the number of lines. So if you have 20 lines on the page, it’s 10 x 20 which is 200 words per page.

I know sprints don’t work for everyone, but I’m a big fan. Lately, I’ve been working on my speed.

I use a bot in Discord as my timer (you can join my server if you want; I do monthly prunes, so lurkers get booted, though), and my top speed is 52 words per minute, which beat out my previous personal best of 48 words per minute.

That said, quantity isn’t the important part of sprinting.

The important part of sprinting is the focus.

It doesn’t matter if I write 50 words during a twenty minute sprint or 500 words or 1000 words. What matters is that I stayed attentive to my project for the entire sprint.

Sometimes, I can get into the zone for the entire sprint, and my wordcount is insane.

Sometimes, I need to go back and read some of what I wrote previously, before I can continue forward. Then my wordcount is lower, but it’s fine, because I was doing what I needed to do in order to move forward.

Sometimes, I need to go back and fix something, I delete a few sentences, and my wordcount actually goes down. But it’s fine, because I was doing what I needed to do in order to move forward.

Sometimes, I don’t even write during sprints. I often edit (and count pages) or do completely other things, like responding to emails or setting up ads or whatever it is I’m working on that particular day. And then I make up completely random numbers (for the Discord bot—it counts wordcount to measure sprints), but it doesn’t matter, because I’m doing what I need to do in order to move forward.

As we move into November, I’m going to be doing a lot of writing sprints because it’s National Novel Writing Month! I’ll be writing a whole book in Nov, so I’ll be needing that word count to succeed.

And if you’re interested, I invite you to join me!

A couple of last minute thoughts:

  • Sprints aren’t for everyone. If they stress you out, don’t do them!

  • You don’t have to share your real wordcount. Nobody cares. Make it up if you want. It’s the focus that matters.

  • Even though doing sprints with other people is structured as a competition, it really isn’t. It’s about focusing. It’s about getting words on the page. Or getting some work done. And if the sprint helped you move forward, you’ve succeeded.

In the end, it comes down to focus. And sprints help me focus. <3

As a side note, I’m putting together a weekly email of writing tips. If you’re interested in joining, click to sign up!

On Audiobooks

Those of you who have been following my career progress know that making my work accessible has been important to me. I’ve done a lot of research over the past year for how I can do that, and right now, though my books are mostly only available on Amazon as e-books and paperbacks, I’ve made some huge strides.

Rutherford has been on major effort: currently, four of the eight books are now available as ebooks wherever ebooks are sold, and I’m working on video editions of them all as well.

Starting next year, Land of Szornyek will be available wherever ebooks are sold (not only on Amazon) and I’m working on taking my paperbacks wide as well (meaning they will be available in more locations than just Amazon, including available for wholesale purchase for bookstores and through the platforms libraries use to purchase their books).

I’ve also made a lot of progress on audiobooks.

For those of you who don’t know how the process works, there are two major challenges with having books turned into audiobooks: the cost and the process.

The cost is of course the most prohibitive part. A good narrator costs at least $200/hour of finished audio. So, a ten-hour audiobook minimally costs $2,000 for production. And that’s fair—cheap even. The process for the narrator requires reading, editing the audio, and fixing any mistakes that they made. It’s a significant time investment on the part of the narrator, and they deserve to be paid for their time.

There are, of course, other options—like royalty share, where you split the royalties 50/50 with the narrator, or an in-between option where you pay them a lower per hour cost, and also split royalties.

But all of these options are complicated and require contracts. And what if the narrator disappears halfway through a series and you have to switch? Or what if after doing a book or two together, you find out that you really don’t like working with each other?

The decisions are difficult, and with that amount of money at stake, it’s extremely draining. It’s a time-consuming and challenging process.

And I have 12 novels and novellas already published which means that’s a minimum of $24k of investment. Not counting the money I’ll have to spend on the design of the audiobook cover image and marketing of the books. And the cost of the upcoming books I currently have in production.

That said, I still think audio is worth it, so I’ve hired one narrator for one series, and have been looking into other options as well, including doing my own recordings for the shorter manuscripts.

And more recently, I experimented with a platform called Descript, which allowed me to record a sample of my voice, which I could then use to read my work. The sample I provided (for my 7-day free trial) was low quality, but the results were still really cool.

I have a lot of thoughts about what I’m going to do moving forward and haven’t made any decisions yet, but I thought I would share the short low-quality sample with you for novelty’s sake.

And if you’re interested in financially supporting my quest to make audiobooks, joining my Patreon is the best way to do that.


At any rate, check out Robot Ariele’s debut recording here! This segment is from the beginning of Ghost Below, a short story companion to the Rove City series, which you can get for free by signing up for my book release newsletter.



How To Buy A Book

Over the years, many people have asked me: “What’s the best way to buy a book?”

And of course, I always tell them, “Buy it from me right now,” because if they go home without buying a book, chances are, they’ll never buy it. But if I don’t have any books on me, or the question has come digitally, my answer is always, “Get it on Amazon.”

But lately, I’ve been seeing a lot of posts on social media encouraging people to avoid Amazon at all costs. To never buy books there. Instead, they recommend, buy from your local bookstore. (You can read my Facebook response here.)

I always get really frustrated when I see these messages, because in truth, local bookstores are rarely willing to carry my books. Which means that if a reader ONLY buys from a local bookstore, they’ll never buy my books. Or the books of most indie authors.

The question of the best way to buy a book is complex, and in order to make that decision, it is important to understand the way the entire industry is currently constructed. To make a fully informed decision about buying a book, you need to know where your money goes.

First, the major players:

  • Authors

  • Editors

  • Agents

  • Publishers

  • Distributors

  • Booksellers

Every single person in this list is out to make money. While some individual people value art or communication or voice or free speech more than money, the truth is, if a person (or group) wants to continue publishing book after book throughout their career, they need to make money in order to survive in a capitalist world.

And when you, a book buyer, are paying for a book, there are a good number of different places your money can go.

So, below, I’ve laid out the complicated structure of the traditional publishing industry and the indie industry, for those of you who want to know more about how it works.

But if you’re just here to know what to do and you don’t want to think about it, let me give you a few quick tips.

First: just buy the book. If you are looking at a new book (used is a different story), holding it in your hands or about to click “buy",” and your thought is, “I wonder if buying it now is the best way to support the author?” the answer is “Yes.” If a reader walks away from a book, the chances of them remembering to buy it later is very, very low. Just buy it.

Otherwise:

If you’re buying from a traditionally published author:

  • Buy the pre-order whenever possible. Think of it like voting. The publisher uses pre-order sales for all kinds of decisions, like marketing, distribution, and whether or not to publish that author again.

  • If you can’t buy the pre-order, buy it from a local indie bookstore or directly from the publisher.

  • Amazon should always be your last choice.

If you’re buying from an indie author:

  • Buy it direct. If the author has the book available on their website, either in hardcopy or ebook format, buy it directly from them. That way, they get 100% of the profit from it.

  • Buy it on their preferred retailer. Some authors only use Amazon. Others would rather you bought from Kobo or iTunes.

  • Support their kickstarters and Patreons. $1 a month for a year costs you $12, but makes a significant difference in the life of an artist. Here’s my Patreon.

How do you know if it’s an indie author or a trad published author? That’s a good question. Many indie published books nowadays are the same quality as trad published. Better even.

Check the copyright page. Trad published books always have a ton of extra info that indie books don’t—about the publisher, the imprint, addresses, all that jazz. Indie books only list the copyright under the name of the author or their own imprint. Once you’ve read through a few, you’ll start to see the pattern.

Buying A Book From A Traditionally Published Author

Traditional publishing is what most people still think of when they talk about publishing. In the trad world there are the Big 5 and then a slew of smaller imprints and presses.

The Big 5 are:

  • Penguin/Random House

  • Hachette Book Group

  • Harper Collins

  • Simon and Schuster

  • Macmillan

The large majority of the books you read in school or college, and buy in bookstores are published by the Big 5 (used to be the Big 6 until a few years ago).

The process looks something like this:

  1. An author writes a book.

  2. The author writes queries and submits them to agents.

  3. Eventually, an agent agrees to represent them.

  4. The agent submits the work publishers.

  5. Eventually, an editor agrees to buy the rights to the manuscript.

  6. They sign a contract.

  7. Then the book (sometimes) gets published.

There is a lot of variation to this process. Sometimes the book isn’t written yet when the author starts querying. This usually only happens in the non-fiction/academic world. Sometimes the author meets an agent at an event and the agent agrees to represent them, no querying needed. Sometimes the author can query editors or publishers directly, no agent needed. Sometimes, even if all of the other steps have been completed, the manuscript never gets published.

A few of the pros of traditional publishing:

  • Reach: trad companies have huge networks, both for marketing and distribution. If they decide a book is best-seller worthy, they have the resources to put thousands of dollars behind marketing it, making it possible for an author to skyrocket to the top of the bestseller lists.

  • Distribution: trad companies have a massive distribution network. They have relationships with major bookstores like Barnes and Noble, and all of the indie bookstores as well. They can also get books into libraries and schools across the country, in a way that is extremely difficult for indies to do.

  • Prestige: there is a lot of prestige associated with being trad published—it’s like you have been “chosen.” Many authors are willing to give up all of their rights and royalties, explicitly for this.

  • Agents: who doesn’t want a dedicated cheerleader? Someone who loves your work, is always encouraging you to keep going, and also does work on your behalf.

  • No upfront cost: if a publisher asks you to pay to submit to them, they’re probably a scam. There are no upfront costs in trad publishing (unless you count money lost by not publishing sooner, or the time involved in the process), and there is a possibility of an advance. That said, advances aren’t what they used to be. You can check out #PublishingPaidMe on Twitter if you’re curious to know more, or you can just check out the spreadsheet.

  • Marketing aid: don’t get me wrong—most trad authors still have to market their own books. But, they will have access to their publisher’s marketing team, and as their book grows in popularity, the publisher is much more likely to offer more and more support so they can make more and more money.

[Side note: this article at Well-Storied presents a pretty solid overview of the pros and cons of trad publishing.]

Now for the cons of trad publishing. One of the biggest reasons authors choose indie over trad is the time this process takes. It can literally take years to go from a completed manuscript to a published book.

Another reason is the contracts. Most contracts don’t offer advances, and if they do, advances need to be paid back by book sales before the author even sees a cent of royalties. Some authors are even required to pay back the advance regardless, which makes it more like a loan than a salary. And if their book doesn’t make back the advance, the publisher probably won’t publish them again. Not to mention, the author typically only receives between 3% and 15% of the royalties—which means the agent, editor, and publisher are splitting the remaining 85% - 97%.

Contracts also tend to be a rights grab. A publisher wants as many opportunities to make money from your work as possible. This means, they want to own as many different types of rights to your book as possible, including e-book and print rights, rights to other language editions, rights to audio book editions, rights to special editions, TV & movie rights, and merchandising rights. There are a lot of great books on this topic if you’d like to learn more.

A couple notable examples:

  • JK Rowling actually maintained the merchandising rights to Harry Potter when she published. This is one of the main reasons she’s a billionaire. [ABC]

  • Recently, Brandon Sanderson launched a Kickstarter for a specialty, limited 10th anniversary edition of his Way of Kings series. The Kickstarter is now over $6 million. The reason he was able to do this, was because he retained the rights to special editions of his work. [Source]

The worst thing about trad publishing in my opinion, is that is run, owned and operated primarily by white, cisgender, able-bodied people, and up until the last twenty years or so, white men specifically. Which means that the work that was selected to be published was and is chosen primarily by one demographic of people and filtered through their lens and view of the world. The result of this is that they published far fewer authors of color, women authors, disabled authors, and LGBTQ authors than white male authors.

“The most recent 2015 study by Lee & Low, the largest multicultural children's book publisher in the country, determined that 79% of the overall publishing industry (including executives, sales, marketing and publicity, and reviewers) was white. While cis, white women have a higher level of representation here than in other aspects of the industry (they make up 78% of people working in publishing), the overall industry is 89% straight/heterosexual, 96% non-disabled, and 99% cisgender.” [Bustle]

This has a ripple effect throughout book publishing, from what authors get published:

The 2018 State of Diversity in Romance Publishing report, released annually since 2016 by Bea and Leah Koch, owners of romance bookstore The Ripped Bodice, found that for every 100 books published by the leading romance publishers in 2018, only 7.7% were written by people of color. That compares to 6.2% in 2017 and 7.8% in 2016.” [Bustle]

…to what topics get published:

“Parrott says she sees publishers shying away from creating more inclusive books for children, opting instead for anthropomorphic animals and machines because they are afraid to make a mistake.” [SLJ 2020] 

…to who gets awards, reviewed by major reviewers, and subsequently, distributed to bookstores and sold… which means that traditional publishers are controlling what books people read. [Vida]

Consider this graphic which Lee and Low released this year:

diversity in publishing.png

This is a survey of the publishing industry—the gatekeepers. And the gatekeepers are not representative of the authors and writers that are out there telling stories.

There are writers of every race, every gender, sexuality, nationality—every possible demographic you can imagine—it’s just that the traditional industry isn’t publishing them.

The key thing to remember here is that traditional authors don’t have any control over their work once they’ve signed over the rights to the publisher. They can ask, request, beg—even hire a lawyer. But once the contract is signed, what the publisher does or doesn’t decide to do with the book is not up to the author.

This includes things like where it’s being sold, how much it’s priced at, whether it’s part of programs like Kindle Unlimited, etc. Once the contract is signed, it’s out of author’s hands, unless they decide to take up the mantle of marketing it on their own.

So what do you do if you want to buy a book from a traditionally published author (remembering of course, that it’s the publisher making the decisions)?

Well, first off, pre-order their book if at all possible. Pre-ordering tells the publisher that people are interested in the book. It’s often used as an early indicator of whether a book will be successful or not. So if a book gets a lot of pre-orders, the publisher is more likely to stock more copies of it and put more money into marketing it.

Similarly, if a bookstore sees that a book has a lot of pre-orders, they’re more likely to order copies of the book to stock and sell, which means more people will see it, which means more sales.

A traditionally published author might only make a few cents from your purchase of the book, but those cents go back to paying back the advance, or to helping the author make a living. Not to mention, every little bit is like a vote. You’re telling the publisher, “I value this author and their work, please publish them again.”

If you can’t pre-order the book, the next best thing you can do is buy it new. Buy it from an indie bookstore if you want to support bookstores in your community, or buy it directly from the publisher. Amazon should be your last choice.

Just remember that every single entity that stands between you and the author takes a cut of that sale: the publisher, the agent, the editor, the distributor, the bookseller. So the more people are in the way, the less money the author makes.

Buying A Book From An Indie Author

In my opinion, Amazon was one of the greatest things that ever happened to the publishing industry.

Of course, indie booksellers and traditional publishers disagree with me on this. But they’re wrong. Here’s why:

Amazon enabled authors everywhere to put their work directly in the hands of the reader. It enabled authors of every nationality, race, gender, ability, sexuality, etc. to say, “You know what, traditional publisher/agent/editor who doesn’t think I’m worth publishing? I don’t need you.”

If you’re a fan of free speech, Amazon’s disruption of the market was one of the best things that’s ever happened, right up there with the invention of paperbacks.

Now, let me just say that I think Amazon is terrible in a lot of ways. They treat their employees terribly. They are a behemoth and a monopoly that needs to be regulated and may need to be split apart.

But they have made a huge and significant difference in the publishing industry, specifically for authors.

So, when someone says “Don’t buy from Amazon!” it always makes my stomach hurt a little. There are so many authors whose only avenue for sharing their work is Amazon. That doesn’t mean it has to be this way, but most authors are one-person teams with limited time and limited resources. So to boycott Amazon, means to boycott them.

And so many indie authors are, in fact, authors of color, LGBTQ authors, authors with disabilities, and other authors who are underrepresented in literature, that by completely boycotting Amazon, you’re saying that the authors who have chosen to use Amazon as their main avenue of making money, are worth less than everyone else.

The truth is, though, you don’t have to buy from Amazon if you really don’t want to. So let me give you a quick run-down of the choices facing indie authors, and subsequently, the choices facing readers. Because once again—it all comes down to where you want your money to go.

First, a high-level overview of the indie publishing process:

  1. It begins with a completed manuscript, just like in traditional publishing. But that’s about where the similarities end.

  2. Next, the author hires their own editors and designers. Common ones include: copy-editor, proofreader, cover designer, paperback designer, and e-book designer. Which ones the author chooses depends on their budget and what skills they have themselves. To hire all of these for an 80k word paperback & e-book is going to cost the author somewhere in the range of $2000.

  3. Next, the author chooses a printer. The two main printers are Amazon (Kindle Direct Publishing) and IngramSpark, though there are other smaller or local printers available (these options tend to be more expensive, especially where shipping is involved).

  4. Next they choose their distributors. Distribution of paperbacks is typically done either through Amazon or Ingram specifically, or direct by the author, meaning they list their books for sale on their website and then do all of the shipping and handling themselves. They may also opt to go to events and sell the books in person. This is time consuming and will significantly drive up the cost of their product, so not all authors choose to do this.

    Ingram is the only distributor that offers wholesale and library options, but to do this, authors must decrease the cost of their product. And just because a book is available for wholesale and library distribution, doesn’t mean booksellers and libraries will actually buy the books. Marketing wholesale is a whole other can of worms.

  5. There are many, many, many options for e-book distribution. Authors typically make one of two choices: to distribute exclusively with Amazon or what we call “going wide” (in other words, distributing books at all retailers).

    Amazon is the top e-book distributor. They control roughly 80% of the market. This is why authors feel like they have to publish through Amazon.

    The other major distributors are Barnes&Noble (Nook), Kobo, iTunes, and GooglePlay.

    1. The benefits to being exclusive with Amazon are significant. They offer several free marketing programs that authors can participate in to distribute their books to a larger audience. The author’s books can also be part of Kindle Unlimited, which is sort of like a Netflix for readers. And, if authors decide to use Amazon ads for their work, they get double the bang for their buck—they can use ads to draw in both KU users and regular buyers.

    2. Going wide means that the author has the potential to hit every single possible market, not just Amazon. This strategy is particularly important for those who want to reach international audiences. Kobo controls 25% of the market in Canada, for example. The challenge with going wide is that it is a lot more work, managing a lot more accounts and platforms, as well as developing different marketing options for all of those markets. Many authors use an aggregator such as Draft2Digital to help manage that, but then the aggregator takes a cut of sales.

As you can see, the process is difficult. The decisions the author has to make are difficult. There are many different directions they could choose to go.

A few pros of indie publishing:

  • Rights: the author gets to keep all rights to their work. That includes every physical edition (paperback, hardback, special and limited editions), merchandising, TV & movies, other language, audio, video games—whatever you can think of. The author can choose to keep or sell those rights.

  • Control: an indie author has complete control over the story, the editing, the quality of the product, their business model, marketing, events, engaging with readers, and pretty much every other angle you can think of. I know authors who hand bind their own books. Others hire local printers. Others use print on demand. Some choose to only make e-books available, and skip the paper versions entirely. Some write to market, and can pivot on a whim. It’s because they have complete control.

  • Time: an indie book can be written and published in a month (depending on the author and their process). There’s no waiting around for agents or publishers or anybody else.

  • Royalties: an indie author gets to keep all the royalties. If they sell direct, that’s 100% of their earnings. Amazon takes 30% of most e-books, so the author gets to keep 70%. Other distributors might take a cut as well, but regardless, the author gets to keep the majority. There’s no middlemen to get in the way.

    In fact, I make more money when you buy an e-book from me than most traditionally published authors make from a hardcover. If you buy a $20 hardcover and the trad author gets 8% of that—that’s $1.60. If you buy a $3.99 e-book from me, I get $2.70. If you buy my $3.99 book on Amazon, and I use Draft2Digital as my aggregator—I still get $2.39.

When you buy from an indie author, you cut out most of the middlemen. You can buy more books, spend less money, and the author will get more. Keep in mind that buying a more expensive book does not mean that more money goes to the author.

So, if you’re looking for the best ways to buy a book from an indie author—buy direct. Buy on Amazon. Or buy on their preferred retailer (if you know what that is). Regardless of which option you choose, the author will retain the majority of the earnings.

The Stigma of Indie

I do want to address the stigmas associated with indie publishing. I’ve had people say to me “Oh, so you’re not a real author,” when they find out I’m an indie author. Or claim that all indie books are bad products or poorly written or full of errors. Or that indie authors are vain and impatient, unwilling to work within the system.

Honestly, believe what you like.

But it’s not true any more.

Plenty of systems have been put in place to increase the quality of indie books. Amazon now has a system to review a book for errors. And readers can report errors to the platform if they find them in a book. Of course, this is a double-edged sword, because some reviewers report stylistic choices instead of errors… but I digress.

The review system has been hugely helpful. Reviewers will write, “this book is poorly edited” and then if several other reviewers confirm it, people stop buying it, its ranking plummets, it stops showing up in search. Again, this can be a double-edged sword for authors, and it doesn’t always work properly, but it’s helpful for readers.

In addition, there has been a push in the indie community as a whole to hire editors and book cover designers. There has been a push within the community for indie authors to hold each other accountable.

I’d also like to point out that there are plenty of traditionally published books that have errors and typos. I like to circle them in red pen because it makes me feel better, lol. There are plenty of traditionally published books with bad covers or bitmappy illustrations. And there are plenty of trad books with terrible stories or poor printing quality.

I'd also like you to consider indie creators in other industries. Would you refuse to eat food cooked by a local restaurant that isn't a big chain? Avoid listening to music that isn't backed by a major label? Refuse to buy art from a painter who doesn't work for Target or Home Goods, or isn't showing in a major gallery? So why then, only read books by traditionally published authors?

The stigma, while it has begun to fade in recent years, is real. But it doesn’t have to be.

On Indie Bookstores

Readers tend to love indie bookstores. As well you should. They are wonderful additions to the community. They have events. They engage with readers and encourage reading. And they are run by people who are obsessed with books and reading.

Indie bookstores are a small business, just like authors. And indie bookstores and indie authors are, well, usually in conflict with each other.

Because we are competitors.

In my experience, it is a rare bookstore indeed that is willing to stock an indie author’s books. When they do, it’s because the books are by local authors. I have actually had an indie bookstore owner tell me to my face that they wouldn’t stock the books of any author who works closely with Amazon.

I get it. Amazon has put thousands of indie bookstores out of business.

But I also struggle with the hypocrisy of a small local business encouraging their community to “shop local” but then only selling books published by the Big 5.

There a few points of contention between indie bookstores and indie authors:

  • Indie authors publish primarily through Amazon, which is the biggest competitor of indie bookstores

  • Only a small portion of indie authors sell their books at wholesale cost, which an indie bookstore needs in order to make money selling indie books

  • Indie authors control their own work, editing, and design, which means extra steps on behalf of the indie bookstore to ensure quality

  • Indie bookstores are gatekeepers between the author and reader, and one of the main reasons indie authors went indie in the first place was to avoid gatekeepers

So, by all means, support your indie bookstores. But remember that the indie bookstores rarely support indie authors. And that’s okay. They exist to serve a specific purpose, and that purpose is not to serve indie authors.

But when you’re talking about where and when and how to buy books, please don’t leave indie authors out of the conversation.

The Plight of the Author

I’m going to risk sounding like a whiny child for a moment here.

I just want to make it clear that authors have gotten the short end of the stick for decades when it comes to publishing. Whether they’re working with a trad publisher and getting miniscule portion of the profits, or have published indie and had to deal with social stigma against indie publishing, or behemoths like Amazon who we rely on for distribution pushing us around, stuffing our books in a dungeon, or banning us without telling us the reason why, all most authors want is to write books and share them with people.

The industry likes to tout major authors with huge names as being success stories that everyone can strive for, but the truth is, the majority of authors never “make it.”

Think of all of the famous authors you know who are currently alive. Now think of all the famous musicians you know who are currently alive.

Tell me: which list is longer? And by how much?

Obviously, this is only a very unscientific anecdotal test. But there is other data out there. Out of all 2,825 billionaires in the world, only two of them are authors (and one of those inherited her billions; also, there are over 45 thousand writers in the US alone—you can do the math on your chances here). And there are fewer than 20 authors who have made over 100 million. Compare that to musicians: 3 billionaires, and dozens who have made over 100 million.

There are only 9 authors who have sold more than a million copies of a book: JK Rowling (the only author to have become a billionaire from books and related income), Stephen King, Dan Brown, Stephanie Meyers, Stieg Larsson, Philip Pullman, Julia Donaldson, Khaled Hosseini, and Fielding. [Source]

Meanwhile, Barnes and Noble was just bought for $638 million (and is probably worth a lot more). Amazon is worth billions and Jeff Bezos is set to be the world’s first trillionaire by 2026—and he started his path with us. Authors. Indie publishing. E-books.

The system has never been for us. We’ve always been at the bottom of the food chain.

Most authors make pennies on the hour for their labor.

And when we complain, people say, “well, you should write better books then,” or “You’re doing it wrong,” or “that’s what happens when you’re running your own business—tough luck.”

Everyone wants to make money off of us, which means no one wants to pay us.

But guess what. We’re going to keep doing it anyway. Because most of us are not in it for the love of money. We’re in it for the love of writing, storytelling, and art.

But that doesn’t we aren’t going to fight back either.

My brother, who is a music producer in Nashville, and I have had many conversations comparing the indie publishing world to the indie music world. There are a surprising number of similarities, it’s just that indie music is 10 or 15 years ahead of indie publishing. But the thing I hate the most is people who will go nuts for indie musicians, turn around and talk shit about indie authors.

Being indie isn’t easy. You work all the time. You have to suck up every loss. There are always people who hate your work, or even hate you specifically.

But I think most of us are going to keep doing it anyway.

And if you’re a reader, a person who loves books, and who cares about authors and the industry enough that you’ve made it this far in my blog post, lol, thank you.

Thank you for reading.

Thank you for buying books.

Thank you for caring enough to learn how it works.

And know, that no matter how you choose to buy a book, the large majority of authors are grateful for your support, one way or another.

On Street Harassment

TW: harassment, street harassment, assault, swearing

I’ve been thinking a lot about street harassment lately. And the reason I’ve been thinking about it is because I haven’t been experiencing it. And the reason I’m not experiencing it is not because the world is becoming a better place or because people are becoming kinder or because I’m getting older. No—it’s because I don’t leave the house anymore.

That, and this story came across my feed recently:

I don't talk about this stuff much because it's stressful and I hate having to defend my experiences—like, "No, I know what I heard. Yes, he used that language to speak to me. No, I wasn't imagining that guy following me for a half mile through the park. Yes, I made a point to walk in a public area and was staying alert to my surroundings. No, it wasn't after dark. No, I wasn't wearing anything inappropriate..." (as if any of that really matters).

I also don’t like to talk about it because it makes everyone feel sorry for me, and they’re all apologetic and stuff—but it’s not like anyone does anything about it. It’s not like men go home and have heart-to-heart conversations with their friends about stopping the behavior. The police can’t do anything. And it’s not like the government cares.

[Though this is not to discount the efforts of organizations such as this one who work specifically on this issue.]

But this kind of incident has happened to me my entire life to the point that I can't even remember most of them. It's just normal. The first time I remember it, I was 14. And it has happened to me in NH, MD, NY, NC, ME, AK, Jamaica, and Scotland (just based on memories I have right off the top of my head) so please don't try to tell me it doesn't happen "where you live" or "in your community."

I have even been inappropriately grabbed (and kissed) in church.

woman-standing-by-door.jpg

And I doubt this will change in my lifetime. What I'd really like to see is more people believing that it happens, and that it happens all the time, even if it doesn't happen to them. And I'd like to see more men talking about it with each other, and having the guts to tell the mouthy ones to STFU—even if they're a complete stranger.

My favorite thing about quarantine is that I don't get called "bitch" every other day anymore--because I don't leave the house anymore.

A few things men have said to me just this year (all before quarantine started, mind you):

  • Bitch

  • You should smile more

  • You want a piece of me in you? (actually, this one happened in May, on my first attempt to go for a walk after lockdown started)

  • Look at that ass/tight ass/etc.

  • You need a ride?

  • Where you going? want company?

  • I'd hit that

  • Hey hot stuff

  • You got a boyfriend?

  • Take your shirt off

  • Show me your tits (yelled at me out of a car window despite Josh standing next right to me)

  • Also had a guy grab my thigh at Walmart with Josh standing right next to me

A few other experiences from past years that have really stuck out to me:

  • "Hey, pretty lady." (I ignore) "You look at me when I'm talking to you, bitch!" (Anchorage, AK)

  • The kid that rode past me on his bike, did a full up-down look and then 180, and proceeded to ride his bike behind me for three full blocks until I turned around and confronted him (Baltimore).

  • The kid that walked up to me and said, "May I give you a compliment?" (stunned silence from me taken as "permission")-- "you have a tight ass" and then he ran away (Baltimore)

  • The guy that stalked me in the park for almost a mile as the sun was setting, and only wandered off when I panic-knocked on my friend's door—and I was so scared, Josh had to come get me in the car even though I was less than a half mile from home (Baltimore)

  • The three guys in a pick-up who yelled at me out the window while I was walking and when I didn't respond, said, "Why do you have to be such a bitch?" (Dover, NH)

  • The dude that pulled over every day for three days in a week to ask me if I needed a ride when I was walking to work, and then proceeded to drive along very slowly beside me to "chat"—and I had to start driving to work again because he had figured out my schedule. (Dover, NH)

  • The three dudes that asked me if I wanted to come hang out with them by their car on the side of the road while I was trying to go for a run (Kingston, NH)

  • The guy on the highway playing "footsie" or "tag" (not sure if there's a term for it) with me by speeding past me, slowing way down, forcing me to pass him, and then speeding past me again—same pattern for almost thirty minutes (I literally thought I was going to die) (Rochester, NH) —this also happened to me in Bath, NY when I was 17, and a few times when I was driving back and forth between NY and NC in college

  • "Wow, you look so old and pretty for your age" (Bath, NY and I was 14)

  • The old dude that grabbed me, hugged, and kissed me on the forehead despite my attempts to get out of his grasp (Kittery, ME)—this one was in a church

... the more of these I type out, the more come to mind, but I'm going to assume you've gotten the point.

And I know the urge is always to say, "I'm so sorry this has happened to you," but please don't. This has happened to nearly every woman in some capacity, not just me. "Sorry" doesn't really mean anything any more.

I know I can't speak for all women, but based on my own experiences and those of other women that I've talked to, it is probable that if a woman sees a male-presenting stranger coming toward her for no reason, the assumption is almost always that he is a potential threat.

Even you.

And I definitely do: all strange men are threats. I don't care how nice you think you are.

There is nothing you can do to change that.

So what can you do? Leave her alone, don't comment on her body or appearance, stay away from her, mind your own business. Call out your friends who are being dicks or who engage in or encourage this type of behavior. And ask if she needs your help before you intervene on her behalf (unless it’s obvious that she’s in trouble).

Anyway, I wrote a poem about this after a stressful incident this summer when I was in a place where I thought I was safe, but turns out I wasn’t.

I don’t usually share my (rare) poetry unless it’s silly, but I decided maybe it would be worth sharing this particular piece.

We Are Not Safe In The Streets

[Note: the things in the poem are incidents which have either happened to me personally, something that I witnessed, or which someone has shared with me during a conversation about this topic.]

ians1.jpg
ians2.jpg
ians3.jpg
ians4.jpg